<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Web Growth Consulting Blog &#187; Google</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.webgrowth.co.uk/wp/index.php/tag/google/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.webgrowth.co.uk/wp</link>
	<description>news and views from the Internet coal face</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 09:12:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Google Vs Bing, the battle rages</title>
		<link>http://www.webgrowth.co.uk/wp/index.php/2009/12/google-vs-bing-the-battle-rages/</link>
		<comments>http://www.webgrowth.co.uk/wp/index.php/2009/12/google-vs-bing-the-battle-rages/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 08:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dinesh Fernando</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet advice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engine optimisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webgrowth.co.uk/wp/?p=52</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Microsoft`s new Bing search engine (don`t ask) at http://www.bing.com/ was launched earlier this year in a direct challenge to Google`s current market dominance. While Bing has been generally well received, it still has a long way to go, with the latest market share for Google above 90%. See our page on the latest market share: [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft`s new Bing search engine (don`t ask) at <a href="http://www.bing.com/" target="_blank">http://www.bing.com/</a> was launched earlier this year in a direct challenge to Google`s current market dominance. While Bing has been generally well received, it still <span id="more-52"></span>has a long way to go, with the latest market share for Google above 90%. See our page on the latest market share: <a href="../../latest-search-engine-market-share.php">http://www.webgrowth.co.uk/latest-search-engine-market-share.php</a></p>
<div id="attachment_57" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://www.bing.com/" target="_blank"><img class="size-full wp-image-57" title="blog_bing" src="http://www.webgrowth.co.uk/wp/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/blog_bing.jpg" alt="Microsoft`s new Bing search engine" width="300" height="180" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Microsoft`s new Bing search engine</p></div>
<p>Microsoft`s clout means Bing will gradually eat into Google`s near monopoly, but most of the same good SEO (search engine optimisation) principles that work with Google will work with Bing.</p>
<p>Therefore Google is still THE search engine you should consider when optimising your website to appear higher in search engine results. We have made Google`s own Search Optimisation Guide available on our <a href="http://www.webgrowth.co.uk/search-engine-optimisation.php">search engine optimisation page</a>, which is an excellent introduction to a huge subject.</p>
<p>Please <a href="http://www.webgrowth.co.uk/contact.php">get in touch</a> for more information on getting your website ranking higher on search engines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webgrowth.co.uk/wp/index.php/2009/12/google-vs-bing-the-battle-rages/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google apologises over Michelle Obama image</title>
		<link>http://www.webgrowth.co.uk/wp/index.php/2009/11/google-apologises-over-michelle-obama-image/</link>
		<comments>http://www.webgrowth.co.uk/wp/index.php/2009/11/google-apologises-over-michelle-obama-image/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 16:48:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dinesh Fernando</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google algorithm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Googlebomb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[images]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michelle Obama picture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[miserable failure]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webgrowth.co.uk/wp/?p=9</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google has apologised for an offensive image of the US first lady Michelle Obama appearing at the top of their image rankings. While Google apologised for the image they did not remove it from their index despite some public and media pressure.

The image was eventually removed from blog, making it fall off the rankings.
This case [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google has apologised for an offensive image of the US first lady Michelle Obama appearing at the top of their image rankings. While Google apologised for the image they did not remove it from their index despite some public and media pressure.<br />
<span id="more-9"></span></p>
<p>The image was eventually removed from blog, making it fall off the rankings.</p>
<p>This case is reminiscent of when typing ‘miserable failure’ into Google pulled up George Bush’s personal profile as the first listing. Again this was because many bloggers and websites had mischievously linked this phrase directly back to George Bush’s website profile. Google eventually intervened and removed the connection but took months to act.</p>
<div id="attachment_10" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://www.webgrowth.co.uk/wp/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/369539947_e3f05b50e5_o.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-10" title="Google has intervened before in the case of George Bush and 'miserable failure'" src="http://www.webgrowth.co.uk/wp/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/369539947_e3f05b50e5_o-300x200.jpg" alt="Google has intervened before in the case of George Bush and 'miserable failure'" width="300" height="200" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Google has intervened before in the case of George Bush and &#39;miserable failure&#39;</p></div>
<p>Google is fiercely protective of its ‘algorithm’, which is the automatic system that decides which websites should rank highly. While the exact details are kept secret one important factor is the quantity and importance of websites linking back to a web page. The Michelle Obama image had obviously been discussed and published on other blogs and news websites sites, pushing it to the top of Google image search.</p>
<p>Relevancy is what has made Google such a huge success and they are justified in protecting their rights to free speech, however you could argue that anyone genuinely wanting to find a picture of Michelle Obama would not be interested in the offensive version.</p>
<p>What do you think?</p>
<p>See more details of the story here: <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/8377922.stm" target="_blank">http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/8377922.stm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webgrowth.co.uk/wp/index.php/2009/11/google-apologises-over-michelle-obama-image/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
